1.4(a) 50use §3024(1) In'''>1"V~'1'1 UAP usually traveled between . nd Altitudes varied for these objects , but frequently registered between "',W and _ mean sea level (MSL). We have _ cases , however in which the observer perceived that the UAP demonstrated and another in which the UAP was detected _ feet MSL. a Handful ofUAP Appear to Demonstrate Advanced Technology 18 incid ents , described in 21 repolis obselvers repOlied unusual UAP movement t'\<>t~~n " c or flight characteristics , and/or A few of these repot1s describe UAP behavior 1 4(a)(g) 50 use § 3024(1) Some UAP appeared to remain stationalY in winds aloft , move against the wind , maneuver abruptly or move at considerable speed without discemable means of propUlsion. In a small number of cases , military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy I associated with UAP sightings as 1 4(a)(g) Although there are we wou ld ,'. ,. 14(a)(g) Recordings of radar displays suggest these UAP"i"'. 50 use § 3024(1) 1 4(a)(g) 1 4(a)(g) 14(a)(g) 14(a)(g) 50 use § 3024(11 a Navy repOli documented •••••••••••• but then appeared to change course and speed , from In 141a) 14(a) 14(a) 50 use § 3024(1) I 1 4(a) 141a) l.4(a) '== Iia UAP exhibited ••••• according to 14(a) The l.4(a) UAPTF lQCUUOn,u reports of aircraft indicating 14(a) UAPTF holds a small amOlmt of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating CC€!lell'atJlon or a degree of signature management However , this 14(a)(g)(e) Additional rigorous analyses is necessary by multiple teams or groups of technical expelis to determine the nature and validity of these data. We are conducting fmiher analysis to detennine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated. to 14(a)(g) during a ll'Em. ,. incident the UAP 1 4(a)(g) 6 50 USC § 3024(1)