— “e should just ly t remove carbon dioide s o from the air instead” s c e i s n ‹t is possible to pull co2 bacƒ out of the air !) a procedure o p s e termed “Direct ir Capture” ›dacœ‚ r — …he remoed co2 could potentiall sere as a useful input into new and existin manufacturin processes‚!! — ’emoin co2 from the atmosphere currentl costs some usdž2–22 per tonne of co2 and costs are expected to fall oer time‚!@ — Šhile dac ma help address climate chane it is unliƒel to be economicall sensible to create a lobal industr capable of remoin co2 at the same scale and pace as we are currentl emittin it‚ ‹t is enerall expected that not emittin co2 in the first place is cheaper than remoin it afterwards‚ — Žurther to proide a lon„term solution to climate chane the co2 remoed would need to be permanentl stored in a manner so that it cannot return to the atmosphere‚ — ‹f such efforts were to use trees and other aricultural methods the would potentiall use a sinificant fraction of lobal aricultural land !# althouh more of this land miht become aailable for such use with risin efficiencies in farmin‚!$ 10 §rieler et al‚ 201¡ 11 Hepburn et al‚ 201ž 12 §eith et al‚ 201— 1 Smith et al‚ 201” 1‘ usubel et al‚ 201 ”0
Pictet Group Oxford Climate Change Study Page 49 Page 51